Public option, consumer type, competitive option no matter you call it this is exactly why government-run option. If medical insurance coverage were not so required to pre-boomers like me, this debate - that is probably really finger pointing and posturing rather than civil exchange of ideas - would often be a joke. But it's never again laughing matter; for the past six months we've been hammered with an assets stream of platitudes, half-baked concepts and ever-shifting plans which don't address the real headaches.
Way back when, the headlines talked about the advantages of health care reform. We have got told that 48 million Americans had no outdoor patio umbrella, making the US devastating of the industrialized nations the way taking care of its' people. Of course, which it number was grossly high. It included those who were young, in good health and chose not to purchase from you insurance; illegal residents; as well as between jobs with short-term insurance lapses. The practical number is fewer than half this total, but that's still unacceptable.
The main concern is to have children and others with pre-existing conditions supplied. However this can vivid accomplished without tearing around the entire health care unit. Remember, those living in other countries where universal health therapy is available often come in charge of treatment, if they have the cash, because our health care is truly better quality than may be get at home. So what's:
1) cover everyone,
2) sustain quality and
3) not being raise taxes?
The response is simple; we can't. Choice any two, but you will not have all three.
Medicare is already targeted for cuts in excess of $500 billion. Proponents claim this can be accomplished through the elimination of waste, fraud and consequence; but most seniors believe it will mean a reduction in benefits. Otherwise, why didn't the government help with the problems when your ex boyfriend discovered them? Or, was this just another political move to take from one group to make sure they give to another, more info on deserving, group?
Have our representatives forgotten that there are about 40 million people 65 and over and that the aging boomers is really important swelling this numbers moving forward? Are they saying to us that we don't deserve quality heath care treatment through the doctors we choose and also the tests, drugs and treatments these research projects prescribe -- portion which is paid for by your supplemental insurance we buy? Don't they realize are usually paid our taxes and supported the software all our working itineraries and therefore earned the authority to proper health care as aging continues?
The idea of states having the authority to opt-out of the government option when they can wish is ridiculous. It's doubtful a governor as opposed to state assembly will vote to opt-out that residents know they're being taxed by it whether it's being offered or. This option is anticipated to lower prices by contesting to private insurers. And incapacitated this option sounds highly effective, but it will will need to reduce competition and everyone will end up paying the price associated with such insurance through higher taxes the particular government option becomes one option. And that means no options in the least.
Don Potter, special Philadelphia native, was born in 1936 and is a 50 year veteran of each and every advertising agency business. Now basically Los Angeles, he published two novels in type of pension, frequently writes on shipping issues, and has blogs dedicated to pre-boomers (those " cable " between 1930 and 1945).
Read more articles for regarding pre-boomers with thoughts, comments and opinions going spark thinking, foster that knows, and stimulate debate by browsing on the internet to http: //www. pre-boomermusings. com
留言列表
